Archives
Categories
Tags
1 Corinthians 2 Timothy 4th Amendment Allan West's black history speech anti-drug campaign article review atheism Bible reading Biblical admonishment blogging C.S. Lewis Christian apologetics Christian service Chuck Colson Collossians drug-testing Ecclesiastes empiricism Ephesians faith function of Church government assistance programs help for poor Isaiah 58 is drug testing constitutional Jerry Seinfeld Jesus karma Leviticus logic marriage motivation online research Philippians Picatcha prayer purpose of Church Richard Jeni role of the Church spam-bots U.S. Constitution website management welfare reform WordPress YouTubeMembers
Category Archives: Series
Debate 8: Foundation and Truth
Answering the question of the masturbation debate is simple enough, but it requires a proper foundation. The assertion that people, who believe in God, commit sin, because they do not really believe, is pretty close to the truth. So why … Continue reading
(7) Divine Law: The grace-based relationship
Divine Law is where theology begins. Attempting to explain God in relation to man by what we can observe from nature only gets us to the conclusion that He exists, that He is good, and mankind is constantly quarrelling with … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetic, Faith, Family, Masturbation Debate, Series
Tagged Bible reading, C.S. Lewis, Christian theology, Divine Law, Grace-based relationship, Jesus
Leave a comment
Debate 6: Moral Law
It would be premature to launch into the topic of a grace-based relationship without first giving support to the notion that God is a person capable of relationship. So far, I have operated from the viewpoint that the concessions made … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetic, Faith, Masturbation Debate, Series
Tagged C.S. Lewis, Jesus, Mere Christianity, Moral Law, Natural Law
6 Comments
Debate 5: None like God
The Bible contains many Scriptures that convey the fact that there is none like God. For now, we’ll take that at face value. There are also many Scriptures that say what God is like. Rather than delve into them all, … Continue reading
Debate 4: Disturbing Passions
As the title above suggests, this is part of a series; and, in my last post, I mentioned that it may be wise to watch the debate that prompted all this before continuing. To start, I will stop calling it … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetic, Faith, Masturbation Debate, Series
Tagged 1 Corinthians, atheism, Christian apologetics, impressionabilty, Jerry Seinfeld, Jesus, logic, masturbation, Richard Jeni, YouTube
6 Comments
(3) Argument in debate: Experience vs. Authority
Empiricism is the doctrine that all knowledge is derived from sense experience. An authority is an accepted source of information. You can look these up yourself or accept that I have already done so. In either case, you will accept … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetic, Faith, Masturbation Debate, Series
Tagged C.S. Lewis, empiricism, logic
7 Comments
(2) Why I love a good debate
Ok, so where did the dollar go? I trust no one had to cheat and look up the solution. If you watched the debate, you likely already know my complaint. The fallacy is in the question. If you haven’t watched … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetic, Faith, Masturbation Debate, Series
Tagged 2 Timothy, Christian apologetics, Chuck Colson, Collossians, Jesus, Philippians
3 Comments
I love a good debate (1)
I love a good debate. I was recently searching YouTube for a specific video I once viewed, not of a debate but of a lecture, when I stumbled across a promising title and clicked it. Amazing Christian Apologist Destroys Atheist … Continue reading
Posted in Apologetic, Faith, Masturbation Debate, Series
Tagged Christian apologetics, online research, YouTube
6 Comments